<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7: Twice as performant as IE6, but half as slow as FF 1.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/#comment-11051</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/#comment-11051</guid>
		<description>Dennis, while I find your comments regarding the grammar in this post entertaining, I'll note that this is a re-post of an Ajaxian article, which I did not author...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, while I find your comments regarding the grammar in this post entertaining, I&#8217;ll note that this is a re-post of an Ajaxian article, which I did not author&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/#comment-11050</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/#comment-11050</guid>
		<description>But, still, this is an interesting article, and thanks for posting. Looks like it's actually *much* closer to ff1.5 than 'half'-near it. Also makes me wonder how ff2 would fare in this test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, still, this is an interesting article, and thanks for posting. Looks like it&#8217;s actually *much* closer to ff1.5 than &#8216;half&#8217;-near it. Also makes me wonder how ff2 would fare in this test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/#comment-11049</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/best-practices/browser-issues/ie7-twice-as-performant-as-ie6-but-half-as-slow-as-ff-15/#comment-11049</guid>
		<description>Half as slow?! C'mon, let's get our grammar/wording straight... 'Slow' is a negative word, so we'll call it -10. If IE7 is 'half as slow' as firefox, that would mean IT WAS FASTER! (such as, for example, Firefox being the full -10, but IE7 being 'half as slow', or -5, which would be faster.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half as slow?! C&#8217;mon, let&#8217;s get our grammar/wording straight&#8230; &#8216;Slow&#8217; is a negative word, so we&#8217;ll call it -10. If IE7 is &#8216;half as slow&#8217; as firefox, that would mean IT WAS FASTER! (such as, for example, Firefox being the full -10, but IE7 being &#8216;half as slow&#8217;, or -5, which would be faster.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
