<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET Update (svn 181), lots of goodies</title>
	<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26468</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26468</guid>
					<description>@Chaffe, I've got our work in a branch in our svn here:

http://cnetjavascript.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1-2/

I'm working on it right now and am about 90% complete with the refactor. I have not tested a single line so far, so it's not ready for actual release yet. I hope to have a release candidate in the next week or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chaffe, I&#8217;ve got our work in a branch in our svn here:</p>
<p><a href='http://cnetjavascript.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1-2/' rel='nofollow'>http://cnetjavascript.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1-2/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on it right now and am about 90% complete with the refactor. I have not tested a single line so far, so it&#8217;s not ready for actual release yet. I hope to have a release candidate in the next week or two.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26467</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26467</guid>
					<description>Awesome. Thanks for passing this along. I've updated the code in SVN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Thanks for passing this along. I&#8217;ve updated the code in SVN.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Williams</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26066</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26066</guid>
					<description>Hi guys, wanted to say I love your work on MooTools stuff and your no-nonsense blog posts. Very helpful!

I thought I'd give a (very) little bit back. 

I came across a bug in your implementation of Digitarald's Autocompleter.js base class. Specifically, you have a misspelled property on line 327: "this.options.mult" -- which means that the query text is never highlighted on additional searches when forms are multi-value enabled. Just a cosmetic issue, but what the heck.

I have created a patch file for the issue if you're interested: http://www.isolationism.com/patches/Autocompleter.js.patch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys, wanted to say I love your work on MooTools stuff and your no-nonsense blog posts. Very helpful!</p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d give a (very) little bit back. </p>
<p>I came across a bug in your implementation of Digitarald&#8217;s Autocompleter.js base class. Specifically, you have a misspelled property on line 327: &#8220;this.options.mult&#8221; &#8212; which means that the query text is never highlighted on additional searches when forms are multi-value enabled. Just a cosmetic issue, but what the heck.</p>
<p>I have created a patch file for the issue if you&#8217;re interested: <a href='http://www.isolationism.com/patches/Autocompleter.js.patch' rel='nofollow'>http://www.isolationism.com/patches/Autocompleter.js.patch</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chaffe Barbar</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26046</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clientside.cnet.com/cnet-js-standards/cnet-update-svn-181-lots-of-goodies/#comment-26046</guid>
					<description>hello Aaron, great work on the 181 build.  I'm trying to run it with mootools 1.2 beta2 (with backward compat.) but I'm having few issues.  any ideas for 1.2 compatibility.  Here is a link to the post I submitted on the moo forums. http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=8133</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Aaron, great work on the 181 build.  I&#8217;m trying to run it with mootools 1.2 beta2 (with backward compat.) but I&#8217;m having few issues.  any ideas for 1.2 compatibility.  Here is a link to the post I submitted on the moo forums. <a href='http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=8133' rel='nofollow'>http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=8133</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
