<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FormValidator gets a makeover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/</link>
	<description>Making stuff work on the other side of the request.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26718</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26718</guid>
		<description>Good point. I don't think that's really a bug though; as you can just add the class to each of the inputs. Still, it's a good point; if I have some time I'll try and address it in our next release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s really a bug though; as you can just add the class to each of the inputs. Still, it&#8217;s a good point; if I have some time I&#8217;ll try and address it in our next release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent R</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26716</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26716</guid>
		<description>I might have found a bug, though.  Try it on your test form (referenced above):

Cause the Sex radio group to fail validation, then select the radio for female.  The advice doesn't hide - guessing that the group isn't re-validated as a whole because that specific radio is missing class="validate-one-require".

It works correctly if you select the radio for Male.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might have found a bug, though.  Try it on your test form (referenced above):</p>
<p>Cause the Sex radio group to fail validation, then select the radio for female.  The advice doesn&#8217;t hide - guessing that the group isn&#8217;t re-validated as a whole because that specific radio is missing class=&#8221;validate-one-require&#8221;.</p>
<p>It works correctly if you select the radio for Male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent R</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26710</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26710</guid>
		<description>Many apologies.  I missed that the class needs to be "validate-one-require" rather than "required".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many apologies.  I missed that the class needs to be &#8220;validate-one-require&#8221; rather than &#8220;required&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26709</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26709</guid>
		<description>can you post a url to an example that isn't working for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you post a url to an example that isn&#8217;t working for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent R</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26708</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-26708</guid>
		<description>This doesn't seem to work  for required radio buttons (say, requiring that one in a group of radio buttons be chosen).

Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t seem to work  for required radio buttons (say, requiring that one in a group of radio buttons be chosen).</p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-12125</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-12125</guid>
		<description>It should... here's a simple test for you to try:

http://clientside.cnet.com/temp/formvalidator.js.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should&#8230; here&#8217;s a simple test for you to try:</p>
<p><a href="http://clientside.cnet.com/temp/formvalidator.js.html" rel="nofollow">http://clientside.cnet.com/temp/formvalidator.js.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-12078</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 05:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-12078</guid>
		<description>Didn't see anything in the change log.  Does this work on Safari yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t see anything in the change log.  Does this work on Safari yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron N.</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-10400</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-10400</guid>
		<description>I think Mootools 1.1 (due out imminently) fixes a lot of support for the most recent build of safari. I'll wait until after it's out to see if I need to refactor my stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mootools 1.1 (due out imminently) fixes a lot of support for the most recent build of safari. I&#8217;ll wait until after it&#8217;s out to see if I need to refactor my stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-10371</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 04:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clientside.cnet.com/widgets/formvalidator-gets-a-makeover/#comment-10371</guid>
		<description>A mootools based form validator is something I've been looking for, for a while now and I know all the cnet libraries are great.  Unfortunately they don't seem to work for me in Safari 2.0.4 or a newer build of Webkit by giving me a long list of variables it cannot find the the debugger.  It works beautifully in Firefox however.  

Just letting you know and I look forward to using this in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mootools based form validator is something I&#8217;ve been looking for, for a while now and I know all the cnet libraries are great.  Unfortunately they don&#8217;t seem to work for me in Safari 2.0.4 or a newer build of Webkit by giving me a long list of variables it cannot find the the debugger.  It works beautifully in Firefox however.  </p>
<p>Just letting you know and I look forward to using this in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
